Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Birmingham's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (35 operators, the largest cohort). Small MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (27.0 days median DOM vs 27.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +1.8% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 50 of 50 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
39% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
6%
43% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.7%
Concessions
20%
100% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
41%
40% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.0%
Concessions
17%
52% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+75.4%
Concessions
0%
33% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−15.1%
Concessions
5%
99% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
0%
65% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.0%
Concessions
11%
64% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
28% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
+33.7%
Concessions
4%
60% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.4%
Concessions
0%
53% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
75% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
1%
44% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.5%
Concessions
6%
34% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
1%
29% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.6%
Concessions
0%
12% Birmingham·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
0%
57% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.1%
Concessions
0%
15% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.4%
Concessions
100%
42% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.6%
Concessions
0%
61% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
69.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
6%
72% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
6%
47% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
103.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
99%
12% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
24%
54% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
50%
71% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
67.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.2%
Concessions
12%
37% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.1%
Concessions
40%
46% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
27%
80% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
8%
30% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.6%
Concessions
2%
61% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
−3.8%
Concessions
0%
60% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.7%
Concessions
18%
67% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
60%
57% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
60.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
1%
100% Birmingham·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
0%
29% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
67% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.0%
Concessions
54%
41% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.5%
Concessions
6%
84% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
16%
65% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
2%
91% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
0%
85% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
36% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
87.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.9%
Concessions
0%
59% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.5 d
Rent vs comp
−13.0%
Concessions
23%
36% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.9%
Concessions
13%
52% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
75% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.6%
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 4,823 addresses plotted across 50 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →