Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Birmingham's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (37 operators, the largest cohort). Small MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (34.8 days median DOM vs 27.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +2.1% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 54 of 54 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
45% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+53.9%
Concessions
0%
56% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.8%
Concessions
0%
38% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
5%
33% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
1%
27% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+27.3%
Concessions
2%
35% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
14%
99% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
63% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
39% Birmingham·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
34%
100% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
51%
46% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+27.4%
Concessions
24%
54% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.6%
Concessions
0%
37% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
6%
100% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
0%
27% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+36.2%
Concessions
0%
61% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
12%
31% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
1%
11% Birmingham·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.2%
Concessions
0%
64% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.5 d
Rent vs comp
+33.4%
Concessions
60%
38% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.3%
Concessions
2%
100% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
83% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
0%
88% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.9%
Concessions
0%
59% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
75.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
6%
61% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
73.0 d
Rent vs comp
+26.6%
Concessions
6%
46% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
104.5 d
Rent vs comp
−5.7%
Concessions
99%
69% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
64.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.0%
Concessions
4%
55% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
47%
63% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.7%
Concessions
66%
11% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
26%
78% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
40% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
3%
87% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.0%
Concessions
9%
95% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.3%
Concessions
3%
61% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.9%
Concessions
0%
15% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.9%
Concessions
100%
41% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.1%
Concessions
4%
62% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
72.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.4%
Concessions
22%
71% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
68.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
15%
34% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.5 d
Rent vs comp
−5.8%
Concessions
28%
53% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
9%
26% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
0%
66% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.1%
Concessions
0%
63% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.5%
Concessions
3%
42% Birmingham·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
9%
69% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.1%
Concessions
17%
100% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
52.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.8%
Concessions
0%
36% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.0%
Concessions
0%
32% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
85.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
85% Birmingham·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
18%
76% Birmingham·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.7%
Concessions
0%
52% Birmingham·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.8%
Concessions
0%
35% Birmingham·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
12%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 4,810 addresses plotted across 54 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Oct 29, 2026 · Learn more →