Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
San Francisco's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (110 operators, the largest cohort). Large MF/BTR Institutional leases fastest (19.0 days median DOM vs 17.0 days market-wide). Large MF/BTR Institutional shows the strongest rent trajectory at +2.6% vs comp.
Market standouts
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 179 of 179 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
84% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.1%
Concessions
0%
35% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.3%
Concessions
0%
60% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+24.5%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+27.1%
Concessions
0%
91% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
6.0 d
Rent vs comp
+36.9%
Concessions
0%
64% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.6%
Concessions
2%
38% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+17.2%
Concessions
9%
95% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.6%
Concessions
0%
81% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.0%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
6.0 d
Rent vs comp
+15.1%
Concessions
0%
97% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.5 d
Rent vs comp
+22.8%
Concessions
0%
97% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+15.8%
Concessions
0%
40% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
6.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.4%
Concessions
2%
76% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+35.8%
Concessions
3%
41% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
1%
84% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.0%
Concessions
5%
49% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
0%
23% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
0%
83% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
0%
23% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
0%
55% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.7%
Concessions
0%
92% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+30.2%
Concessions
2%
69% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.8%
Concessions
0%
94% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.0 d
Rent vs comp
+15.2%
Concessions
0%
64% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
0%
97% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
+19.4%
Concessions
0%
59% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
33% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
6.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.4%
Concessions
0%
82% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.7%
Concessions
0%
65% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−14.0%
Concessions
0%
25% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.0%
Concessions
0%
48% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.3%
Concessions
0%
93% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
6.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.6%
Concessions
0%
36% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.8%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.5 d
Rent vs comp
−3.6%
Concessions
0%
48% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.4%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+23.1%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+15.4%
Concessions
0%
83% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+23.2%
Concessions
0%
45% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
3%
38% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
0%
63% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.9%
Concessions
1%
89% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
0%
56% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.6%
Concessions
0%
70% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.7%
Concessions
0%
21% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
0%
16% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
0%
25% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.2%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+33.5%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
0%
79% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.2%
Concessions
0%
27% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.2%
Concessions
2%
42% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
4%
34% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
1%
62% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
1%
61% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.8%
Concessions
0%
26% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
62% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.7%
Concessions
8%
11% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.8%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
31% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+27.8%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
2.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
55% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
3%
90% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
79% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
3.5 d
Rent vs comp
−11.5%
Concessions
0%
54% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.2%
Concessions
6%
32% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.0%
Concessions
2%
100% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
3.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
0%
87% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
67% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
5%
41% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
10%
39% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.5 d
Rent vs comp
+7.7%
Concessions
0%
57% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.5 d
Rent vs comp
−20.0%
Concessions
0%
39% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.5%
Concessions
2%
100% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
0%
72% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.9%
Concessions
0%
18% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.1%
Concessions
0%
42% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.1%
Concessions
0%
34% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.0%
Concessions
0%
54% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
25% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
+16.9%
Concessions
0%
32% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.7%
Concessions
0%
26% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
1%
17% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
76% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.6%
Concessions
0%
41% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.2%
Concessions
0%
64% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
0%
35% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
46.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
1%
37% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
1%
58% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.3%
Concessions
0%
62% San Francisco·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
57.0 d
Rent vs comp
+45.3%
Concessions
0%
60% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.4%
Concessions
0%
71% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
3%
89% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
46.5 d
Rent vs comp
−21.8%
Concessions
0%
82% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
81.0 d
Rent vs comp
+19.3%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
0%
71% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.7%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
78% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
62% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−16.2%
Concessions
0%
86% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
0%
31% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.3%
Concessions
0%
34% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−31.2%
Concessions
0%
87% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.8%
Concessions
0%
37% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.8%
Concessions
0%
17% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
36% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.9%
Concessions
0%
52% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
93.5 d
Rent vs comp
−12.6%
Concessions
0%
91% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.3%
Concessions
0%
22% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+23.6%
Concessions
0%
80% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.4%
Concessions
38%
55% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
+22.5%
Concessions
17%
20% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
0%
47% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+32.5%
Concessions
0%
72% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.1%
Concessions
0%
55% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.3%
Concessions
0%
59% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.5 d
Rent vs comp
−5.9%
Concessions
0%
86% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.5 d
Rent vs comp
+13.5%
Concessions
0%
75% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
70.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.1%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
+24.9%
Concessions
0%
35% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
0%
33% San Francisco·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
0%
40% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.6%
Concessions
0%
87% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.2%
Concessions
0%
64% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
28% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
16%
45% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−16.8%
Concessions
0%
42% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
54% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
46% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.4%
Concessions
0%
23% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
0%
96% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.0%
Concessions
14%
46% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.0%
Concessions
0%
15% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
3%
54% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.5%
Concessions
0%
21% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.5 d
Rent vs comp
−7.9%
Concessions
0%
83% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.1%
Concessions
1%
52% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
0%
30% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.3%
Concessions
0%
19% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.9%
Concessions
6%
37% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−33.2%
Concessions
0%
77% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.2%
Concessions
0%
33% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.7%
Concessions
0%
71% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.0%
Concessions
2%
24% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
28% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.4%
Concessions
0%
45% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.0%
Concessions
9%
30% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.7%
Concessions
0%
39% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
4%
31% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.2%
Concessions
0%
100% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
116.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
35%
68% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.4%
Concessions
0%
48% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
0%
89% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
78.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
0%
86% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
66.0 d
Rent vs comp
−15.8%
Concessions
0%
52% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
23% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.2%
Concessions
0%
42% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
0%
88% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.7%
Concessions
4%
21% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.7%
Concessions
0%
48% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.5 d
Rent vs comp
−7.8%
Concessions
0%
47% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
91% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
29% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.6%
Concessions
0%
19% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
22%
36% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.8%
Concessions
0%
83% San Francisco·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
82.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
6%
61% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
65% San Francisco·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
77% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
0%
67% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
62% San Francisco·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
59.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
0%
36% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
65% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
16%
53% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.2%
Concessions
0%
21% San Francisco·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.3%
Concessions
0%
97% San Francisco·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
64.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.6%
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 14,429 addresses plotted across 179 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →