Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Chicago's operator landscape skews toward Small MF/BTR Independent (128 operators, the largest cohort). Large MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (18.0 days median DOM vs 21.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +0.6% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 214 of 214 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
95% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
75%
72% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+32.8%
Concessions
10%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.1%
Concessions
0%
74% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.3%
Concessions
7%
55% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.7%
Concessions
0%
35% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.7%
Concessions
0%
35% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
3.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
4.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
80% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
21% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.2%
Concessions
1%
36% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
−9.2%
Concessions
25%
25% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.2%
Concessions
3%
74% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
3.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
90.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.7%
Concessions
0%
76% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.1%
Concessions
0%
97% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.4%
Concessions
39%
48% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.4%
Concessions
11%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
0%
28% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.7%
Concessions
0%
25% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
+12.7%
Concessions
3%
50% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.8%
Concessions
0%
26% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.8%
Concessions
8%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.5%
Concessions
0%
44% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.7%
Concessions
0%
14% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
+18.7%
Concessions
25%
88% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
62% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.9%
Concessions
0%
56% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
32% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.1%
Concessions
0%
20% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−32.8%
Concessions
0%
55% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
0%
72% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
3%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
0%
7% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
10%
21% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.6%
Concessions
5%
85% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
0%
24% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
0%
21% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
0%
96% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.2%
Concessions
0%
89% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.5 d
Rent vs comp
+24.4%
Concessions
0%
9% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
0%
22% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
31%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.1%
Concessions
50%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
55% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
98% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
62.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
94% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.4%
Concessions
48%
88% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+24.4%
Concessions
0%
74% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
0%
47% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.1%
Concessions
0%
39% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
0%
11% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
1%
51% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.5 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
0%
26% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.1%
Concessions
0%
92% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+59.9%
Concessions
0%
28% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
0%
94% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.3%
Concessions
0%
97% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.0%
Concessions
3%
82% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.5%
Concessions
5%
49% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
96.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.1%
Concessions
0%
18% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
21% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
0%
29% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
69% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
0%
70% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
2%
23% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.2%
Concessions
0%
78% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
+12.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
5%
33% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
4%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
30% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.5%
Concessions
0%
8% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.3%
Concessions
0%
90% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
51% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.7%
Concessions
4%
96% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+51.7%
Concessions
0%
32% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
0%
28% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.2%
Concessions
0%
83% Chicago·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
38% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.5 d
Rent vs comp
−9.6%
Concessions
0%
50% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+39.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.6%
Concessions
0%
97% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
95% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.1%
Concessions
1%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
0%
99% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.4%
Concessions
0%
75% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.4%
Concessions
0%
57% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
51% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
17%
98% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.8%
Concessions
0%
35% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−21.7%
Concessions
3%
81% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
53% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+16.2%
Concessions
0%
95% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+14.0%
Concessions
0%
60% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.8%
Concessions
0%
16% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−14.8%
Concessions
5%
26% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
0%
91% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
0%
79% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.4%
Concessions
3%
53% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
77% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
0%
37% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
0%
22% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
34% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
11% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
0%
25% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
99% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
13% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.5 d
Rent vs comp
−14.3%
Concessions
0%
35% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.5%
Concessions
85%
51% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.9%
Concessions
0%
70% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
20%
39% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
0%
33% Chicago·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
0%
96% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
0%
48% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
25% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.8%
Concessions
0%
64% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.0%
Concessions
0%
58% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
0%
30% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.1%
Concessions
0%
17% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.1%
Concessions
0%
95% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.7%
Concessions
59%
46% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
3%
62% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−28.1%
Concessions
0%
82% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
0%
51% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.1%
Concessions
7%
50% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
21% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.9%
Concessions
0%
91% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
97% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
9%
18% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
8%
92% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
67% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
62% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.5 d
Rent vs comp
−31.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
59.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.3%
Concessions
0%
38% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−22.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
47% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.0%
Concessions
24%
100% Chicago·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
0%
29% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.9%
Concessions
0%
79% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
52.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
45% Chicago·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.9%
Concessions
0%
20% Chicago·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
69% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−39.5%
Concessions
0%
98% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
−31.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
31% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
−19.0%
Concessions
0%
53% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
−22.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
57% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.6%
Concessions
0%
83% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Chicago·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
112.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
75% Chicago·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
119.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
0%
82% Chicago·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 18,534 addresses plotted across 214 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →