Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Indianapolis-Carmel, IN MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Indianapolis's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (41 operators, the largest cohort). Large MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (20.0 days median DOM vs 25.0 days market-wide). SFR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +0.4% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 81 of 81 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
78% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
7%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
94% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
0%
84% Indianapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.8%
Concessions
4%
82% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.4%
Concessions
0%
64% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.0%
Concessions
39%
95% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.8%
Concessions
0%
65% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
32%
74% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+25.1%
Concessions
0%
63% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
41% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
92% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
2%
40% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
10%
100% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.2%
Concessions
0%
89% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
+12.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.7%
Concessions
0%
46% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
64% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
6%
52% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
0%
68% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.4%
Concessions
0%
83% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
17%
94% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
17%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
0%
85% Indianapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
0%
55% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.4%
Concessions
18%
82% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
0%
69% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
39%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.6%
Concessions
0%
43% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.9%
Concessions
0%
53% Indianapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.7%
Concessions
0%
39% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
0%
66% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.5 d
Rent vs comp
+7.6%
Concessions
0%
63% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
2%
50% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.9%
Concessions
0%
69% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
3%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.2%
Concessions
32%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
57.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
0%
91% Indianapolis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
37%
33% Indianapolis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
99% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
10%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
0%
46% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
0%
96% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.2%
Concessions
0%
71% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
99% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
70.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
0%
62% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
16%
88% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
6%
49% Indianapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.6%
Concessions
0%
71% Indianapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
96%
56% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
72% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.1%
Concessions
31%
97% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.2%
Concessions
6%
59% Indianapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.8%
Concessions
0%
97% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.7%
Concessions
1%
80% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
5%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
12%
56% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
93% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
1%
93% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
8%
84% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
13%
60% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
113.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
87%
60% Indianapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
66.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.6%
Concessions
0%
86% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
11%
98% Indianapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
46.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
75% Indianapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.9%
Concessions
31%
75% Indianapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
65.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.9%
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Indianapolis-Carmel, IN MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 7,865 addresses plotted across 81 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →