Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Minneapolis's operator landscape skews toward Small MF/BTR Independent (76 operators, the largest cohort). Large MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (15.5 days median DOM vs 25.0 days market-wide). SFR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +1.2% vs comp.
Market standouts
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 135 of 135 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
42% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.5 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
0%
82% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
0%
22% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.0%
Concessions
4%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.5 d
Rent vs comp
+11.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
0%
80% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.3%
Concessions
0%
14% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.2%
Concessions
1%
34% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.3%
Concessions
23%
46% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.8%
Concessions
0%
77% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.3%
Concessions
18%
46% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.4%
Concessions
0%
53% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.0%
Concessions
35%
52% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
27%
28% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
10%
36% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
0%
21% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.9%
Concessions
0%
17% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.5%
Concessions
2%
50% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
0%
44% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.4%
Concessions
0%
35% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
0%
30% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+24.4%
Concessions
0%
47% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.5%
Concessions
0%
15% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
0%
43% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.8%
Concessions
0%
58% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.1%
Concessions
4%
68% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.1%
Concessions
0%
21% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.1%
Concessions
18%
58% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.8%
Concessions
0%
17% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
9.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
25% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.8%
Concessions
10%
59% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
0%
77% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.6%
Concessions
0%
56% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
76.0 d
Rent vs comp
+18.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.4%
Concessions
0%
85% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
5% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.4%
Concessions
0%
40% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
18% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
7%
39% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.5 d
Rent vs comp
−27.6%
Concessions
0%
13% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.1%
Concessions
0%
70% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
0%
84% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
0%
51% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
0%
70% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.1%
Concessions
0%
96% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.5%
Concessions
0%
53% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
46% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
11%
64% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+57.6%
Concessions
3%
42% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.3%
Concessions
0%
81% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.2%
Concessions
0%
31% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.7%
Concessions
0%
96% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
59%
92% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.0%
Concessions
0%
31% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.1%
Concessions
9%
64% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.3%
Concessions
0%
61% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.5 d
Rent vs comp
−9.5%
Concessions
0%
37% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.2%
Concessions
0%
43% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
15%
55% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.4%
Concessions
0%
48% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.6%
Concessions
0%
70% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
0%
26% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
42% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.9%
Concessions
0%
41% Minneapolis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
58.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
68.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
13% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
0%
15% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
5%
62% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+26.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
78% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
0%
50% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.4%
Concessions
1%
88% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.9%
Concessions
0%
77% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
12%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
85.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
0%
47% Minneapolis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
108.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
0%
58% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
0%
94% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
92.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
55% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
29% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.5%
Concessions
0%
44% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
0%
42% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
66% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
33% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
44%
33% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
0%
33% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.6%
Concessions
0%
22% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
33% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
0%
82% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
76% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
0%
58% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
0%
14% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
1%
20% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
0%
63% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.8%
Concessions
0%
89% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.6%
Concessions
0%
48% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
16% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.6%
Concessions
1%
77% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
59% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.0%
Concessions
0%
77% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
45% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
17%
56% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.0%
Concessions
0%
76% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.6%
Concessions
0%
38% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
56% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
67.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
13%
43% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
52% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.0%
Concessions
0%
44% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.8%
Concessions
0%
70% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
77.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
46.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
73% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
0%
52% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
41% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.2%
Concessions
0%
71% Minneapolis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
5%
63% Minneapolis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.3%
Concessions
1%
67% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.1%
Concessions
1%
93% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
52.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
68% Minneapolis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
91.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.5%
Concessions
16%
100% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
67% Minneapolis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.0%
Concessions
7%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 13,991 addresses plotted across 135 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Oct 29, 2026 · Learn more →
