Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Cleveland's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (36 operators, the largest cohort). Small MF/BTR Independent leases fastest (31.0 days median DOM vs 32.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +2.4% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 73 of 73 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.8%
Concessions
0%
76% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
7%
68% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
3.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
0%
65% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
0%
40% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.1%
Concessions
0%
35% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.4%
Concessions
0%
54% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.0%
Concessions
0%
48% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.1%
Concessions
0%
48% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
31%
100% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
3%
43% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.4%
Concessions
0%
57% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.3%
Concessions
0%
49% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
47% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.7%
Concessions
0%
56% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.1%
Concessions
0%
64% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.4%
Concessions
46%
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.5%
Concessions
0%
54% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.9%
Concessions
0%
56% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.3%
Concessions
3%
71% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−18.8%
Concessions
0%
29% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
28%
71% Cleveland·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.8%
Concessions
3%
77% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
5%
27% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−17.5%
Concessions
0%
30% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
−21.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
0%
64% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.6%
Concessions
0%
83% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.0 d
Rent vs comp
−19.4%
Concessions
0%
49% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
67% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.7%
Concessions
1%
64% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
27% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.1%
Concessions
0%
44% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
5%
55% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
69% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
0%
60% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
0%
26% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
−18.0%
Concessions
0%
83% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
67.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
67.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
69% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
71.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.0%
Concessions
0%
81% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
2.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
23% Cleveland·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
79% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.4%
Concessions
0%
73% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
0%
97% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
2%
47% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
0%
39% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
42%
78% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
51% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.7%
Concessions
1%
66% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.8%
Concessions
0%
24% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
0%
22% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
0%
68% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.4%
Concessions
0%
40% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
88% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.6%
Concessions
0%
49% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
89.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
95% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.5 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
0%
72% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Cleveland·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
0.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
26% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
62% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
52% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−17.6%
Concessions
0%
66% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
42% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.0%
Concessions
5%
100% Cleveland·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
50% Cleveland·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
50% Cleveland·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
70.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.8%
Concessions
0%
51% Cleveland·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 5,293 addresses plotted across 73 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →