Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Memphis's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (48 operators, the largest cohort). SFR Independent leases fastest (37.0 days median DOM vs 34.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +4.9% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 69 of 69 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
26% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.7%
Concessions
28%
72% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
+14.6%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.7%
Concessions
0%
82% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.9%
Concessions
39%
80% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
59.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.4%
Concessions
3%
83% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
8%
71% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
1%
19% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
60% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
27%
62% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.4%
Concessions
11%
37% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.2%
Concessions
3%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
2%
42% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.4%
Concessions
9%
38% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
0%
30% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
0%
94% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
4%
46% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
0%
87% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
6%
50% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
31%
26% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
2%
98% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
11%
40% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
0%
87% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
60.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
5%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
79% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
13%
50% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.1%
Concessions
0%
68% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.6%
Concessions
14%
88% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
11%
54% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
50%
80% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.8%
Concessions
4%
76% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.3%
Concessions
11%
98% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.2%
Concessions
28%
86% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.9%
Concessions
0%
90% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
−7.9%
Concessions
0%
43% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.0 d
Rent vs comp
−18.9%
Concessions
5%
96% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.5 d
Rent vs comp
+22.3%
Concessions
30%
100% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
57.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.4%
Concessions
2%
59% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
2%
96% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
0%
94% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
1%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
49% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.2%
Concessions
2%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
93% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
34%
99% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
50% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
44%
82% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.8%
Concessions
33%
73% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
14%
83% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.0%
Concessions
0%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
9%
35% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.8%
Concessions
6%
59% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
60.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
48%
100% Memphis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
57.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.8%
Concessions
0%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
1%
44% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.0%
Concessions
0%
91% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.2%
Concessions
0%
76% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.9%
Concessions
35%
71% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
80% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
61.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.5%
Concessions
17%
87% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
110.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
82.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
5%
100% Memphis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
97% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 6,911 addresses plotted across 69 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Aug 20, 2026 · Learn more →
