Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Memphis's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (48 operators, the largest cohort). SFR Institutional leases fastest (28.0 days median DOM vs 32.0 days market-wide). Small MF/BTR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +2.9% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 68 of 68 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
79% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.9%
Concessions
0%
23% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
22%
100% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+23.2%
Concessions
0%
82% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.7%
Concessions
46%
82% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
11%
73% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.5%
Concessions
3%
22% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
7.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.6%
Concessions
0%
92% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
0%
36% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.2%
Concessions
3%
61% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
10%
91% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.3%
Concessions
11%
57% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.0%
Concessions
26%
29% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
0%
88% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
91% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.1%
Concessions
13%
96% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
4%
42% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.9%
Concessions
0%
90% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
8%
49% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.6%
Concessions
30%
88% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.3%
Concessions
6%
96% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
10%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
65.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
2%
44% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
0%
69% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
+13.2%
Concessions
22%
41% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.5%
Concessions
8%
87% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.4%
Concessions
3%
100% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
80% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
3%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
8%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
80% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
12%
79% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
7%
69% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
0%
53% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.1%
Concessions
51%
87% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
5%
81% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
0%
96% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
+22.8%
Concessions
25%
39% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
71.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.1%
Concessions
5%
86% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
101.0 d
Rent vs comp
+18.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
65.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.0%
Concessions
2%
52% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.4%
Concessions
1%
83% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
35%
37% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
45% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
49%
61% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.3%
Concessions
5%
39% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
4%
90% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
0.0%
Concessions
9%
77% Memphis·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−14.4%
Concessions
13%
27% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
43.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
0%
96% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
45.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
0%
89% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
0%
88% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
0%
98% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
58.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
36%
88% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
57.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
0%
99% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
56% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.6%
Concessions
0%
75% Memphis·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.1%
Concessions
39%
62% Memphis·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
56.5 d
Rent vs comp
−10.8%
Concessions
32%
79% Memphis·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
63.5 d
Rent vs comp
−7.0%
Concessions
14%
62% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
105.5 d
Rent vs comp
−21.3%
Concessions
0%
100% Memphis·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
97% Memphis·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
50.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Memphis, TN-MS-AR MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 6,884 addresses plotted across 68 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Oct 29, 2026 · Learn more →