Property manager intelligence
Operator IQ identifies the operators worth knowing in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA MSA. Find property managers with proven lease velocity, stable rent trajectories, and durable tenant retention. Filter by portfolio composition and ownership posture. Every ranking is grounded in first-party listing data and computed against same-cohort peers, not a single market-wide average.
Seattle's operator landscape skews toward SFR Independent (115 operators, the largest cohort). Large MF/BTR Institutional leases fastest (21.0 days median DOM vs 24.0 days market-wide). SFR Independent shows the strongest rent trajectory at +1.7% vs comp.
Stars indicate top-percentile performance against same-cohort peers. Gold stars are earned for top-tier performance on a metric; silver stars mark the next tier. Operators are ordered by total gold stars first, then silver, so multi-dimensional performers rank highest. Click any operator for the full scorecard.
Showing 234 of 234 ranked operators. Operators below the data sufficiency threshold are excluded from this view. See Methodology →
23% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.2%
Concessions
6%
35% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.7%
Concessions
0%
57% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
5.0 d
Rent vs comp
+16.3%
Concessions
53%
41% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
10.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
37% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
0%
48% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+5.4%
Concessions
28%
33% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
5%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.5 d
Rent vs comp
+6.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.4%
Concessions
7%
36% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
4%
81% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
10%
25% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.1%
Concessions
2%
22% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.5%
Concessions
1%
51% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+11.4%
Concessions
0%
55% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.5%
Concessions
1%
68% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.0%
Concessions
0%
27% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.5%
Concessions
3%
36% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.2%
Concessions
3%
19% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.9%
Concessions
0%
70% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.1%
Concessions
8%
46% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.6%
Concessions
13%
51% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
0%
29% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.6%
Concessions
5%
85% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
2%
18% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.5%
Concessions
2%
44% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
53% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.7%
Concessions
0%
57% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−35.3%
Concessions
1%
25% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+7.3%
Concessions
1%
24% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.5 d
Rent vs comp
+8.5%
Concessions
18%
24% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
34%
40% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
0%
35% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
0%
81% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.0%
Concessions
9%
55% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
71%
97% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
0%
83% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
37% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
45% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
2%
46% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
43% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
17.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
19% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.0%
Concessions
3%
51% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.7%
Concessions
0%
23% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.2%
Concessions
2%
16% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.2%
Concessions
2%
31% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
2%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.7%
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−9.5%
Concessions
5%
34% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.7%
Concessions
10%
23% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.0%
Concessions
1%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.2%
Concessions
0%
65% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
23% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.3%
Concessions
0%
63% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.0 d
Rent vs comp
+10.8%
Concessions
6%
37% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
39.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
42%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.2%
Concessions
0%
43% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.5%
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
+15.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
0%
84% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+54.8%
Concessions
4%
59% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
90.0 d
Rent vs comp
+18.2%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
+9.6%
Concessions
40%
51% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
59.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.0%
Concessions
0%
99% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.7%
Concessions
62%
57% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
21% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
62.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
45%
25% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
7%
30% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
7.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
10%
38% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.9%
Concessions
13%
36% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
8%
72% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
6%
100% Seattle·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
7%
66% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.5%
Concessions
0%
64% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
86% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.6%
Concessions
1%
34% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
0%
91% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.3%
Concessions
8%
31% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
15%
30% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.4%
Concessions
4%
44% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
4%
62% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
1%
34% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.1%
Concessions
0%
33% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
+36.6%
Concessions
0%
35% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.8%
Concessions
7%
91% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+5.4%
Concessions
3%
99% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
64% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
12.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.3%
Concessions
0%
43% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.4%
Concessions
3%
86% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.2%
Concessions
0%
35% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
0%
68% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.8%
Concessions
13%
38% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
3%
21% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
3%
60% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
16.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
19%
80% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−37.2%
Concessions
0%
15% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.7%
Concessions
0%
52% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
15.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
0%
16% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
+8.6%
Concessions
0%
99% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.5%
Concessions
1%
30% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
0%
24% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.2%
Concessions
0%
21% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
8.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
25% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.6%
Concessions
0%
50% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.2%
Concessions
21%
47% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.5%
Concessions
0%
29% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.8%
Concessions
5%
57% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.5 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
10%
68% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
2%
60% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
38%
37% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.9%
Concessions
2%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.5%
Concessions
0%
90% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
13.5 d
Rent vs comp
+2.5%
Concessions
1%
52% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.0%
Concessions
3%
36% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.5%
Concessions
3%
41% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.1%
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+23.9%
Concessions
15%
62% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.0%
Concessions
0%
57% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
88% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−15.6%
Concessions
2%
95% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.5%
Concessions
1%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
0%
67% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
67% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.4%
Concessions
66%
71% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.7%
Concessions
29%
87% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.1%
Concessions
23%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.9%
Concessions
1%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.0%
Concessions
0%
60% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.1%
Concessions
48%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
55.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
43% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
69.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.6%
Concessions
12%
56% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
115.0 d
Rent vs comp
+4.3%
Concessions
0%
29% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
5%
26% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.1%
Concessions
0%
17% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
14.0 d
Rent vs comp
+1.4%
Concessions
0%
53% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
43% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
26.5 d
Rent vs comp
+12.7%
Concessions
3%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
11.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
0%
44% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
+4.5%
Concessions
0%
22% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.5%
Concessions
17%
23% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.5 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
2%
17% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
19.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.3%
Concessions
0%
42% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−18.2%
Concessions
13%
35% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−13.0%
Concessions
2%
28% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
18.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.6%
Concessions
0%
29% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
0%
65% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
90.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
+22.1%
Concessions
5%
39% Seattle·est. <50 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
76%
90% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.5 d
Rent vs comp
+30.8%
Concessions
0%
84% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
+20.2%
Concessions
0%
93% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
87.0 d
Rent vs comp
−12.0%
Concessions
0%
52% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
77.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.8%
Concessions
0%
33% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.5 d
Rent vs comp
−22.5%
Concessions
2%
48% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.4%
Concessions
0%
45% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
31.5 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
0%
56% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
112.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.6%
Concessions
0%
57% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
53.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.6%
Concessions
0%
79% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
78.0 d
Rent vs comp
+6.5%
Concessions
64%
99% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.6%
Concessions
13%
62% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
44.0 d
Rent vs comp
−8.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
54.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.6%
Concessions
0%
62% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.2%
Concessions
43%
100% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
26% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.4%
Concessions
0%
87% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
19.5 d
Rent vs comp
+3.8%
Concessions
3%
65% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
29.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.2%
Concessions
7%
99% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.8%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
48.5 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
5%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
21.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
37% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.5%
Concessions
22%
29% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
36% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
1%
90% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.6%
Concessions
4%
84% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
20.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+3.2%
Concessions
0%
97% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.1%
Concessions
13%
37% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.6%
Concessions
0%
45% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.0 d
Rent vs comp
+2.8%
Concessions
2%
36% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.3%
Concessions
0%
86% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.3%
Concessions
1%
61% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
4%
87% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.9%
Concessions
5%
77% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.1%
Concessions
0%
87% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
+0.9%
Concessions
3%
81% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
30.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.5%
Concessions
3%
19% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−11.4%
Concessions
8%
61% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.4%
Concessions
0%
81% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
22.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
18%
70% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.5 d
Rent vs comp
−8.3%
Concessions
0%
64% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
24.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
2%
82% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
23.0 d
Rent vs comp
−0.1%
Concessions
0%
19% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.4%
Concessions
8%
52% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
38.5 d
Rent vs comp
+1.9%
Concessions
22%
35% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
−16.7%
Concessions
0%
64% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
28.0 d
Rent vs comp
−19.7%
Concessions
16%
89% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.8%
Concessions
0%
41% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
−7.0%
Concessions
0%
90% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.9%
Concessions
0%
71% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
60.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.8%
Concessions
0%
28% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
40.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.1%
Concessions
0%
61% Seattle·est. 1,600+ managed units
DOM (T12)
36.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.4%
Concessions
3%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
27.0 d
Rent vs comp
−14.0%
Concessions
0%
88% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.1%
Concessions
1%
31% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
59.5 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
0%
71% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
25.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.8%
Concessions
2%
75% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
34.0 d
Rent vs comp
−3.3%
Concessions
0%
37% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
42.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.0%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.6%
Concessions
0%
87% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
61.0 d
Rent vs comp
−6.3%
Concessions
5%
51% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.5 d
Rent vs comp
−2.5%
Concessions
3%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
32.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
71% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
33.5 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
25% Seattle·est. 400–800 managed units
DOM (T12)
41.0 d
Rent vs comp
−1.2%
Concessions
1%
33% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
47.0 d
Rent vs comp
−2.9%
Concessions
0%
99% Seattle·est. 200–400 managed units
DOM (T12)
35.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
58% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
49.0 d
Rent vs comp
−10.7%
Concessions
0%
60% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
51.5 d
Rent vs comp
−6.5%
Concessions
0%
52% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
69.0 d
Rent vs comp
−5.7%
Concessions
0%
100% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
120.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
0%
54% Seattle·est. 800–1,600 managed units
DOM (T12)
37.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.9%
Concessions
0%
77% Seattle·est. 50–100 managed units
DOM (T12)
86.0 d
Rent vs comp
−4.6%
Concessions
0%
63% Seattle·est. 100–200 managed units
DOM (T12)
86.0 d
Rent vs comp
—
Concessions
2%
Quadrant
Each dot represents one observed listing address across all eligible operators in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA MSAover the trailing 12 months. Color indicates the operator’s quadrant classification. 21,980 addresses plotted across 234 operators.
Watch lists
Operators ranked by trailing-twelve-month median Days on Market within-quadrant. Data sufficiency requires ≥30 listings in trailing 12 months. Within-quadrant ranking requires ≥3 PMs in cohort. Methodology v0.8 · Data as of Oct 29, 2026 · Learn more →
